01 · Defined accountability
People remain responsible for consequential decisions.
Governance
AI entering real operations must remain accountable to the institution deploying it. Defined authority, controlled access, traceability and human control are operating requirements, not a document added later.
Four principles
People remain responsible for consequential decisions.
AI capabilities operate according to roles and permissions.
Important actions and decisions can be reviewed.
Systems return authority to people when risk or policy requires it.
The authority model
Autonomy without authority is not intelligence we are willing to deploy. Systems may recommend, coordinate, monitor and act within defined boundaries, but those boundaries must be visible, reviewable and owned by people.
The full authority model is published by our research division, Kodasōken.
The system may read approved sources and present information with provenance.
The system may propose actions. A person decides.
The system may perform a defined action within limits, with approval where policy requires it, and every action logged.
When risk, uncertainty or policy demands it, authority returns to a named person.
Control of data
What we do not claim
We do not display certification badges we cannot document. Where a client requires a specific attestation, we say what we hold, what we can provide under NDA, and what would need to be established during the engagement.
Uptime or continuity figures are given with a definition, a measurement window, the workload and the incident classification, or not at all. We demonstrate a failed dependency, a recovery and an operator handover, not only a successful workflow.
Data paths, retention, sub-processors, model routes, audit completeness, deprecation notice, exit path. Bring your security reviewer.